Jump to content

Coroutine Sequences

Josh

247 views

I am experimenting with a system for creating a sequence of actions using Lua coroutines. This allows you to define a bunch of behavior at startup and let the game just run without having to keep track of a lot of states.

You can add coroutines to entities and they will be executed in order. The first one will complete, and then the next one will start.

A channel parameter allows you to have separate stacks of commands so you can have multiple sequences running on the same object. For example, you might have one channel that controls entity colors while another channel is controlling position.

function Script:Start()
	local MotionChannel = 0
	local ColorChannel = 1

  	local turnspeed = 1
	local colorspeed = 3

  	--Rotate back and forth at 1 degree / second
	self:AddCoroutine(MotionChannel, ChangeRotation, 0, 45, 0, turnspeed)
	self:AddCoroutine(MotionChannel, ChangeRotation, 0, -45, 0, turnspeed)
	self:LoopCourtines(MotionChannel)--keeps the loop going instead of just running once

  	--Flash red and black every 3 seconds
	self:AddCoroutine(ColorChannel, ChangeColor, 1, 0 , 0, 1, colorspeed)
	self:AddCoroutine(ColorChannel, ChangeColor, 0, 0, 0, 1, colorspeed)
	self:LoopCourtines(ColorChannel)--keeps the loop going instead of just running once
end

There's no Update() function! Where do the coroutine functions come from? These can be in the script itself, or they can be general-use functions loaded from another script. For example, you can see an example of a MoveToPoint() coroutine function in this thread.

The same script could be created using an Update function but it would involve a lot of stored states. I started to write it out actually for this blog, but then I said "ah screw it, I don't want to write all that" so you will have to use your imagination.

Now if you can imagine a game like the original Warcraft, you might have a script function like this that is called when the player assigns a peasant to collect wood:

function Script:CollectWood()
	self:ClearCoroutines(0)
	self:AddCoroutine(0, self.GoToForestAndFindATree)
	self:AddCoroutine(0, self.ChopDownTree)
	self:AddCoroutine(0, self.GoToCastle)
	self:AddCoroutine(0, self.Wait, 6000)
	self.AddCoroutine(0, self.DepositWood, 100)
	self:LoopCoroutines(0)
end

I wonder if there is some way to create a sub-loop so if the NPC gets distracted they carry out some actions then return to the sequence they were in before, at the same point in the sequence.

Of course this would work really well for cutscenes or any other type of one-time sequence of events.



6 Comments


Recommended Comments

Very similar to how I did my cutscenes.

It would be nice if Leadwerks supported this as well, but allowed the user-interface to add co-routines. 

For my cutscenes, I have things like

Start Animation,
Go to position,

Go to rotation.

You could even have a "Execute Lua Function".


I like it!

Share this comment


Link to comment

Yes with coroutines. These things are amazingly powerful.

So I'd say while this does work for some situations it's not as flexible. Sometimes you want to run multiple coroutine enabled functions at the same time and not continue until both are done. In a cut scene let's say you want to move from point A to B but also kick off some audio (the bad guy is talking as he's moving). He will reach his destination point before his speech is finished. The next step is to move again, but you want his speech and his first movement to be completed before you continue on.

In my cut scene library I had my coroutine enabled methods return ID's of the coroutine itself, then made a method that would check if that coroutine was completed or not. So I could start both coroutine enabled functions and then do a loop checking if both were in a 'dead' state before continuing.

local moveId = MoveToPoint(...)
local speechId = StartAudio(...)

-- don't recall lua syntax for looping atm
while(IsCompleted(moveId) == false && IsCompleted(speechId) == false)
loop

-- continue with something else

 

I would think at a minimum what you could do is make each script function a coroutine, or maybe let us somehow define that a script function should be coroutine enabled. This is what I did in my state manager library. In the scripts Update() I call my state manager Update() function. You change states by just calling stateMgr:ChanageState("StateName"). You added the script 'self' when creating the state manager because when you changed states it would look for functions of that state in that script by concatenating the state name to _Enter(), _Exit(), or _Update() and since you can search for functions by string name in Lua if the StateName_Enter() or StateName_Exit() function existed it would make a coroutine from them. The Update() was a normal function that looped while in that state, but I found myself using _Enter() more because coroutines rock.

It might be nice to just have state type stuff built into these LE scripts honestly. States usually have an enter, exit, update. You don't need an update as you can get the same behavior by looping in enter and yielding out though. Exit is nice in case there are any cleanup stuff for that state. Wherever you are in that script you can change the state by calling some kind of ChangeState() function. Since you're dealing with coroutines you sort of need that because it tells the underlying system to stop calling that coroutine.

If you're curious on how this works I have the library uploaded to the workshop. It's FSM (Finite State Machine). I think it's easy to use and gets the point across with states that have their enter/exit functions coroutine enabled.

Share this comment


Link to comment

@Rick The whole thing is very interesting because you are programming a "flow" of events instead of a frame-by-frame slice.

Maybe a sequence can be created that has two sub-sequences. Something like "bake the chicken and pour the wine" and then dinner is ready when both sequences are complete.

I am also thinking about a sub-sequence. If your AI is going to a destination point, but they see a powerup on their way there that they want, it makes sense to create a subtask "go get the powerup" and then resume what they were doing. If a peasant is collecting wood and is attacked by an orc, he should fight the enemy and then go back to collecting wood. He would not start the process over, he would go back to the point he left off.

I can think of how to draw that on paper with lines but I don't know yet what the commands would look like.

Share this comment


Link to comment

You are starting to get into the idea of behavior trees a little there (which you should totally implement as well into Turbo as they are amazing for AI). I did implement a general behavior tree with Lua. I found a lua implementation and converted it to work with LE. I implemented that into that dinosaur game me, Tim, and Shad did (which I can't find in the games section for some reason).

https://github.com/tanema/behaviourtree.lua

If you start reading up on behavior trees you see they have the idea of sequences. So the actual task or doing is the thing you originally were talking about with coroutines, but the structuring of all these tasks is what the behavior tree handles. A nice UI to manage the trees is handy as well. I think I used this https://github.com/behavior3/behavior3editor which exported to json and then the library I modified I created a function that loaded the json result of this editor into the behavior tree structure. It was pretty slick actually.

Behavior trees have the idea of interrupts that you can put on any branch that would look for things that should take the AI off the current task and rerun the entire behavior tree again. When behavior trees are being ran through they run through your sequences in order so you always put the highest priority sequence first like getting shot at, or starving. Some sort of self preservation. When you're in a lower priority sequence the interrupt would say check your hunger level and if < 10 it would bail out of the current sequence and rerun the tree, which then the highest priority sequence would see you're hunger and then run it's sub sequences like find food, or cook food, whatever.

You can play around with the editor online: https://www.behaviortrees.com/#/editor

So if you hover over the Nodes header section on the right a New link comes up and that's where you'd make your new node actions like WalkToPoint or condition like IsHungry.

It's actually really cool, very powerful, and fun to play with!

You can even dynamically expand an actors "knowledge" by adding entire behavior trees as sub sequences!  Imagine you creates a behavior tree that just has the sequence of "How to start a fire when cold". Then let's say you have 5 AI around your map. You start them with a basic behavior tree that has sequences like Find Food, Hunt, etc but you give 1 of them the "How to start a fire when cold" sequence. Then you code the game that when 2 actors bump into each other they share sequences in their behavior tree they have so you then give the other actor the "How to start a fire when cold" sequence and now you have AI teaching each other sequences they know. One might be able to expand this to make a more "real" AI that tries to randomly mix and match actions (you'd just have to code a bunch of actions that are available) to create their own sequences and if those sequences help their stats (hunger, thirst, etc) in any way they keep them and if they don't help they remove them! How cool would that be!

 

 

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Blog Entries

    • By Josh in Josh's Dev Blog 5
      You might have seen this graphic comparing the size of the world in different games. I've played Fuel, and never reached the end of the world in that game. You can drive for a very long time on those roads.

      We want to use the new engine for realistic simulations of air and ground movements. At normal cruising altitude of a commercial airliner, the pilot has a view range of about 400 kilometers. The image below shows that area (800 x 800 km). You can see the areas of the biggest games ever fit neatly into the corner of just our visible area.

      The gray space above is not the total world size, it is just the area you can see at once from high altitude. The total world size is about 50 times bigger.
      This is what I am working on now.
    • By Josh in Josh's Dev Blog 26
      Gamers have always been fascinated with the idea of endless areas to roam.  It seems we are always artificially constrained within a small area to play in, and the possibility of an entire world outside those bounds is tantalizing.  The game FUEL captured this idea by presenting the player with an enormous world that took hours to drive across:
      In the past, I always implemented terrain with one big heightmap texture, which had a fixed size like 1024x1024, 2048x2048, etc.  However, our vegetation system, featured in the book Game Engine Gems 3, required a different approach.  There was far too many instances of grass, trees, and rocks to store them all in memory, and I wanted to do something really radical.  The solution was to create an algorithm that could instantly calculate all the vegetation instances in a given area.  The algorithm would always produce the same result, but the actual data would never be saved, it was just retrieved in the area where you needed it, when you needed it.  So with a few modifications, our vegetation system is already set up to generate infinite instances far into the distance.

      However, terrain is problematic.  Just because an area is too far away to see doesn't mean it should stop existing.  If we don't store the terrain in memory then how do we prevent far away objects from falling into the ground?  I don't like the idea of disabling far away physics because it makes things very complex for the end user.  There are definitely some tricks we can add like not updating far away AI agents, but I want everything to just work by default, to the best of my ability.
      It was during the development of the vegetation system that I realized the MISSING PIECE to this puzzle.  The secret is in the way collision works with vegetation.  When any object moves all the collidable vegetation instances around it are retrieved and collision is performed on this fetched data.  We can do the exact same thing with terrain   Imagine a log rolling across the terrain.  We could use an algorithm to generate all the triangles it potentially could collide with, like in the image below.

      You can probably imagine how it would be easy to lay out an infinite grid of flat squares around the player, wherever he is standing in the world.

      What if we only save heightmap data for the squares the user modifies in the editor?  They can't possibly modify the entire universe, so let's just save their changes and make the default terrain flat.  It won't be very interesting, but it will work, right?
      What if instead of being flat by default, there was a function we had that would procedurally calculate the terrain height at any point?  The input would be the XZ position in the world and the output would be a heightmap value.

      If we used this, then we would have an entire procedurally generated terrain combined with parts that the developer modifies by hand with the terrain tools.  Only the hand-modified parts would have to be saved to a series of files that could be named "mapname_x_x.patch", i.e. "magickingdom_54_72.patch".  These patches could be loaded from disk as needed, and deleted from memory when no longer in use.
      The real magic would be in developing an algorithm that could quickly generate a height value given an XZ position.  A random seed could be introduced to allow us to create an endless variety of procedural landscapes to explore.  Perhaps a large brush could even be used to assign characteristics to an entire region like "mountainy", "plains", etc.
      The possibilities of what we can do in Leadwerks Engine 5 are intriguing.  Granted I don't have all the answers right now, but implementing a system like this would be a major step forward that unlocks an enormous world to explore.  What do you think?

    • By Haydenmango in Snowboarding Development Blog 6
      So I've been researching snowboarding lately to get an idea of what animations and mechanics I need to create for my game.  I have learned lots of interesting things since I've only seen snow once or twice in my entire life and have never even tried snowboarding or any other board sports (skateboarding, surfing, etc.) for that matter.
       
      Snowboarding tricks are quite interesting as they are mostly derived from skateboarding.  Snowboarding tricks pay homage to their equivalent skating tricks by sharing many concepts and names.  For example basic grabs in snowboarding share the same concepts and names as skateboarding: indy, mute, method, stalefish, nosegrab, and tailgrab.  Something interesting to note is in snowboarding you can grab Tindy or Tailfish but this is considered poor form since these grabs can't be done on a skateboard (due to the board not being attached to the skaters feet) and grabbing these areas is generally something a novice snowboarder does when failing or "half-assing" a normal grab.  Check out this diagram to see how grabs work -
       
       
      So, after reading lots of text descriptions for tricks I was still confused by what all these terms meant and how they were actually applied.  So my next step was to look up these tricks actually being done and I found some really cool videos showing off how to do various tricks.  This video in particular is the best reference material I've found as it contains nearly every trick back to back with labeled names and some tweaks -
       
      Sadly my rigged model doesn't handle leg animations with the snowboard that well so I can't animate as many tricks as I want to.  Regardless there will still be around 15 total grab/air tricks in the game.  Now it's time for me to stop procrastinating and start animating!  
×
×
  • Create New...