Jump to content

Leadwerks is so cozy

tipforeveryone

406 views

I spent a whole week for learning UE4 with cpp, yep, UE4 is a great engine for sure, but I found out that my mind could not understand the way UE4 works easily. It is too complex and made me tired. Then I returned to my Leadwerks project and felt so familiar. Soooo... sweet, everything is simple as it is

It felt like I have had a long trip to UE city then return to my hometown. I miss Leadwerks indeed.

Last year, I thought I could only use Leadwerks with LUA and never touch its CPP side. But I tried my best, learned Cpp for 8 months. Now I am not a cpp pro but I am confident in using this language. At least I can rewrite my whole project in CPP instead. this 3-years project helped me to understand my potential and interest in gamedev.

I wish Josh be successful in progress of making Turbo, a new hope for much better Leadwerks.

To all people who are using Leadwerks and help me these years, love you.

...

Peace!

  • Like 2


15 Comments


Recommended Comments

I too use cpp and although a bit shaky in understsnding classes I managed to make a couple and all is going well .I like your post.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 10/7/2019 at 4:32 PM, Slastraf said:

there are still some bugs here and there that just drain your motivation always a bit

This exactly.  There have been quite a few show-stopping bugs for me too.  A character controller that was buggy that still isn't completely fixed (though Josh tried), navmesh generation by code that is broken on large maps (though navmesh isn't even dynamic so it doesn't support basic things like doors opening), glitchy vegetation, broken vehicles, etc.  I used to start a game with fingers crossed that things will be OK.  Now I mostly just use Leadwerks for its clean C++ commands, renderer and simpler projects.  I don't try to do anything fancy.  If I did this for more than a hobby, as much as I love Leadwerks and have been a fan and active community member since version 2.x, I would use another engine as well.

On 10/7/2019 at 4:32 PM, Slastraf said:

I am not a friend of monthly subscription payment for Turbo

As far as I remember, the subscription model may only be here for the beta.  There was talk about it being a one-time purchase on release but I don't think a final decision was made.

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment

I like this thread because we speak about motivation to make a game with Leadwerks and I'm feeling I'm loosing this motivation too.

But not because Leadwerks, because the few bugs you are speaking about can be often walk around (make your own character controller, set the tree a far away to avoid or forgive the pop up effect ...)

I would encounter the same problems I discovered with an other engine too;

The difficulty is the main problem for me, because you should have a team of workers because it is so much work to finish a game properly. Or you need years of work and motivation, with job and family, it is quite impossible, is it ?

Secondly - and the biggest thing for me -  I personally can't hope anymore that people will play my game, supposing the game would be funny, finish and playable.

Why this ? Because this game would fall in an infinity of other indie games and as Hobby game maker I have no resources to make an effective advertising.

There is an ocean of games that are inviting players in all sort of different kind of scenes possible, and you need a great idea nobody does, if you want your game not fall anonymous.

Maybe I would reach a number of hundred players, well, is this really 10 years work worth ?

I'm still working on my dream game but only because I like the challenge to make it. That's enough, but the motivation to finish it may lacking because if you are not ubisoft today, you just have almost no chance anyone notice your game.

It is just like art. If you have abilities to draw, it is fine, and then you see on pinterest that other million people have the same ! lol

 

  • Like 3

Share this comment


Link to comment

To play devil's advocate as you have: you don't need a team to make a great and successful game.  A lot of people fall into the trap of wanting to make the next World of Warcraft or Call of Duty or whatever.  You need to either seriously reduce your scope or accept that you won't finish your game (as you seem to have done).  There have been a ton of single-man developers and especially two-person teams that have been wildly successful.  Also, if you have money, you can always hire artists, musicians, coders and others to help.

To address your second point, yes, there's a good chance that not many people will play your game.  Even completed, far more games fail than succeed.  That's the nature of the business.  It happens to big companies too.  Then there are random little games like Minecraft that one person starts as a hobby, shares on a forum or two, the community goes wild and the game makes millions.  There are a ton of factors that contribute to this but a big one seems to be that you're connecting with your fans early on.  Minecraft and Spelunky (original) were released early as hobbies and communities enjoyed them and it grew from there.  Then there are companies you can hire (somewhat like publishers) that can work on getting your game out there for you (just be careful of shady ones that demand too much - I've seen devs screwed over).  How much of the marketing side have you read up on and tried implementing?

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

I don't want to "advocate" anybody if not what I'm feeling ;)

No you may not need a team but then time. It s not easy near family and job.

21 hours ago, gamecreator said:

Minecraft and Spelunky (original) were released early as hobbies and communities enjoyed them and it grew from there. 

Yes that's the best way that may happen, isn't it ?

21 hours ago, gamecreator said:

How much of the marketing side have you read up on and tried implementing?

lol about...nothing. I wanted to tell I'm not the person for this. I just don't feel good by advertising.

furthermore I have no game ready to sell !

I like the challenge of scripting, animating, seeing things becoming harmonious on the screen, and, if I would succeed to make a bigger project, I would be happy other would play this.

But sorry I'm not the person for that, like I'm lacking in this ability to present things like a customer must think "I want to try it".

There are people (sometimes include ubisoft too ;) ) that are so good in this that they can sell sh!t for a so good thing, that customers will be disappointed.

Like a little bit seems to be happened with breakpoint ghost recon.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
2 hours ago, Marcousik said:

I wanted to tell I'm not the person for this. I just don't feel good by advertising

...

I'm not the person for that, like I'm lacking in this ability to present things like a customer must think "I want to try it".

That's fair.  It's not for everyone.  I prefer developing to advertising too.  But the more people you want to play your game, the more you have to get out there and show it off and remind people what you have going on.  If you never share your game, you'll never get others to be interested.  And it's good to see it that way too.  Sure, some people won't care and won't want to play it.  That's normal for every game, indie or AAA.  But others will.  And those are the people you focus on, who want to hear from you, assuming you have interesting progress to show.  Just be honest about what the game is and what the game isn't.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
2 hours ago, gamecreator said:

And those are the people you focus on, who want to hear from you, assuming you have interesting progress to show.  Just be honest about what the game is and what the game isn't.

That's a nice phrase!

One problem remains (of course I know you are not my Psy but thx for reading yes 👍)

I'm stil having problem to believe I could make a game better than an AAA perhaps existing yet.

Looking at Witcher, GTA, Watch dogs, greedfall, Gothic and so much more other "perfect" games I think there is no reason why anybody should play my game !

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

Try not to compare your game to those of AAA studios who have dozens of workers and millions of dollars to spend on development and marketing.  Your situation is different.  But just because a game is smaller doesn't mean it can't be popular.  There are a lot of single-man or small-team developers who have had hundreds or thousands of players, some having made millions.  Even a relatively simple game like VVVVVV sold over a million copies.  Sure, you won't make the next GTA or Witcher because you don't have the resources but you can still make a similar, enjoyable game.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

People wanted a new engine so I am making a new engine. It takes years to develop these things. Just switching over to Vulkan took six months to get basic rendering working. Anyone who needs the performance and scale of the new engine is welcome to use it, otherwise I am not going to try to convince them.

I expect that right now is going to be pretty much the lowest point of engagement because we have a new technology that has been a WIP for several years and isn't ready yet. And there is going to be some change in the community because Turbo Engine has a different type of user than Leadwerks has.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
14 hours ago, gamecreator said:

Even a relatively simple game like VVVVVV sold over a million copies.

I think that's more or less the idea I wanted to speak about. 

No matter the engine (if it is stable enough of course - and I think LE 4.6 is) you can make a fun thing that other people can enjoy.

All the challenge is to be creative, finding something fun. Because so much content has been made yet. An re-making games other did better yet gives no motivation.

And so the choice of the engine you want to work with has to be in the same line as your game concept requires. If not you are losing your time.

It's like in making music, I can buy more and more instruments (like features or assets) pretending I could do better with, but in reality if I do not master them or just find a good use of them, it stays nonsense. The point is the tools have to serve the ideas, and not the ideas the tools. That could be the reason why for my part and for now I don't need another engine.

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment

Well I already find it a little comedic that my comment criticizing LE game engine got removed so I cannot partake in this discussion. Honestly its kind of sad.

  • Confused 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
4 hours ago, Slastraf said:

Well I already find it a little comedic that my comment criticizing LE game engine got removed so I cannot partake in this discussion. Honestly its kind of sad.

Since you say it is not acceptable as a professional tool, why are you here? I just received ten orders for the enterprise version from a little company called Northrop Grumman, but I guess you are the expert.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

Leadwerks is a great tool, the problem is that a tool does nothing, if there is no one to push the talent, work, development. 

Then any bad worker will blame the tools.  I also rest a while and came back with a fresher mint and I share what some say, learning is my hobby and improving my skills is a challenge that somehow allows me to advance to the next level.  

Übersetzt mit www.DeepL.com/Translator

Share this comment


Link to comment

Sure it's a tool but a better tool gets better results.  If you can write 10 lines of code instead of 1000, that's hours of work saved and usually more likely that you'll end up with something nice to show off.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
1 minute ago, gamecreator said:

Sure it's a tool but a better tool gets better results.  If you can write 10 lines of code instead of 1000, that's hours of work saved and usually more likely that you'll end up with something nice to show off.

I agree, and that's why we're not creating video game engines, talent has another for that, all the tools are usually great, but no matter how much I install UDK, CryEngine, Torque, Unity, they don't do anything by themselves. Then comes something that I think, and I can be wrong, make us right on a tool, see its advantages and focus on it, and know how to deal with their mistakes. 

Now, we could be creating games directly from c++ and Vukan in a Visual Studio environment, but for that you need talent, and that's what professional studios and famous games pay for. 

In the end my point of view is simple, I use Leadwerks, because I don't have the talent needed to make a video game engine, or create with other development environments.  Here it's easy, in other parts they throw you an immense api and defend yourself as you can and in the same way you find problems, errors, difficulties, but the question is how to have the ability to solve them.

It's just what I think, and most likely I'm wrong. 

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Blog Entries

    • By reepblue in reepblue's Blog 5
      There has been some discussion regarding on how to set collision shapes for your models. For 95% of models, you should be building shapes with the Model Viewer as described here. In some cases, the model artist might want a custom shape to be made. In this post, I'll be going over how I import models into Leadwerks, and building custom shapes.
      A few notes first. I use Blender; Blender 2.79b to be exact. I haven't get got the hang of 2.80 and until the new engine's art pipeline is fully online, I don't see a use for it. Leadwerks 4 uses Blinn-Phong rendering so the PBR stuff makes no sense for Leadwerks 4. So for this, I'll be posting screenshots from 2.79b. I should also mentioned that a feature I use in my process isn't present in the Linux build of the editor, which is the collapse tool. (Tools->Collapse). Doing the collapsing via a terminal will cause the models to crash the editor. This seems to be a known bug, as you don't see that feature in the Linux editor.
      Lets say you created a tube model such as this one and you want the player and objects to go into the tube:

      If you tried to make a shape doing the Concave settings, not only it'll be really slow to generate, but the results will not be good. We could make a shape based on the wire frame, but this is a high poly model. What we need to do is make a new mesh, import both models  to the editor, collapse them both, build the shapes for both, and delete the low poly model while making the high poly read the low poly's generated shape.
       
      First to get it out of the way, apply the scale and rotation of the model. This will make Y forward and the scale will be (1,1,1) when you import it into Leadwerks.

       
      Next we need a low poly model.

      This is the same proportions as our high poly. Apply the scale and rotation as the same as the high poly. I also set the max draw time to solid, but this is optional.

      Next, name your High poly and the low poly you're going to be using for the shape appropriately.

      Now lets, export each object as a FBX. For this my high poly is going out as tube.fbx, and my low poly shape is going out as tubeshape.fbx. Here are my export settings:

      If you saved the files in a Leadwerks project while the editor was opened, the editor would have auto convert the files to the .mdl file format. Open the high poly model (tube.fbx) and first collapse it and give it any shape. (Give it a box shape to save time.) you need to assign a shape to the high poly so the mdl file is linked to a phys file. Do the same with the low poly, but you're gonna set the shape as poly mesh.


      Close the model viewer, and then go into the directory where the models are placed. We are now going to delete the box shape of our high poly, and trick it into loading the low poly shape by renaming the shape file of the low poly to be what the previous shape of the high poly was. In other words, we are making tubeshape.phy into tube.phy.
      Before:

      After:

      Notice the time stamp and the size of tubeshape.phy from before being the same as tube.phy in the after screen cap. This should be your end result.

      Notice that the shape isn't sold but now a tube. Objects can go into the tube with no issues. Now, there is another way that uses limb names to generate physics automatically. However, there are a lot of issues I came across using this method such as the shape not being parented to the model when the model moved via physics or a joint. With this way, you have a custom shape, the model is optimized because it doesn't have any children nodes, and everything is clean and tidy!

       
    • By 💎Yue💎 in Dev Log 5
      The prototype is finished, and the mechanics of the game can be given way.  It has established a desert terrain in the form of dunes, this implies that there are no cannons or anything similar, because Leadwerks does not allow a terrain to cast shadows on that same terrain and this looks visually rare.
      So the terrain is like low-slope dunes. On the other hand, I think the texture of the terrain is already the definitive one, with the possibility of changes and suggestions on the part of those involved in this project.
      On the other hand we have taken the model of a habitat of the nasa, which certainly looks very nice. 
      The next steps, are to establish the starting point of the player, this must start near the capsule return to Mars somewhere on the map of 2024 x 2.
      And think about the first thing you should do, repair your suit? Seek a shelter? things like that.  


    • By 💎Yue💎 in The shock absorbers 2
      It's interesting that when you become an expert on something, you're not sparing any effort to see how something works, but rather you're focusing on creating something. And so everything becomes easier.
      At this point of learning there is a glimpse of a low idea of creating a game, but the secret of all this is to keep it simple and to be very clear that a game is a game, and not an exact simulation of the real world. For example anyone who has a low idea of the red planet, will understand no matter the colors of the scene that is a terrain of Mars, even if it is not very real what is transmitted, a game, that's just it.
      At this point I already have an astronaut character who runs from one place to another on a very large 4096 x 4046 terrain that would surely take a long walk. My previous prototype projects involve a vehicle, but I didn't get the best implementation prospect in that time and I always found performance problems in my machine, something that isn't happening with the character controller for a third person player. 
      As always, I think I'm a scavenger looking for game resources, that's where this community exposes links to websites with interesting hd textures, and one or another model searched on the net, but what I've greatly improved is learning to write code, I have a better workflow, writing Lua code focused on the paradigm of object programming.



      Something interesting is the system of putting rocks, all very nice from the point of implementing them. And it works very well with the character controller if you put collision in cube form.
      I've been thinking about implementing a car system, I think it would be necessary in such a large terrain, but I think it's not the time, my previous experience, involves deterioration in performance and something I think is the physics of the car with respect to the terrain and rocks that in the previous project involve deterioration in the fps. Although if you implement a car would have an option would be to remove the rocks, but I prefer not to have a car and if you have rocks. 
       
       
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...