L B

Haha, question everyone here dreaded, heh?

We have, you're changing names so all references to Lumooja starting language holy wars are erased from the newcomers' minds.

Seems like someone hasn't read anything of the "Updates to this article" part, and jumped straight to the benchmarks. Most of your complaints are addressed there. Moreover, why don't you tell the article author instead of us? We surely won't satisfy your intentions.

Oh psh Mika, don't go creating other accounts to vote Android up.

I can really guess Mika's answers. The only one with a vote for Linux, evening the votes for Android? Tsk, so predictible.

Who would've thought one sentence could summarize Lumooja.

Fixed it using the Default format in GIMP DDS plugin instead of A8R8G8B8.

Paint .NET, A8R8G8B8, no mipmaps.

I tried making a FontStudio font, but it only renders white. I attached 4 files (2 different fonts) to this post, could anybody test them and tell me if they can get it to work? Thanks! Fonts.zip

You might want to post that in the advanced discussion/general programming or whichever forum. It's not really C# related per se.

No, I meant these comments. RP, feel free to host the files. If people are determined, they'll just reflector it.

Apparently, I removed public SVN access when I quit a couple of weeks ago out of the mess the Werkspace community implied.

So... this is basically delegates?

I found someone who made a new type of interpolation for this system. It's really great looking.

This thread clearly branched off because all you troll-feeders forgot MakeFPSGame is a current working API command. It's interesting, though.

^title. Could help greatly for height/width calculations.

Try/Catch over class initialization is a perfectly fine practice, at least, in C#/.NET (in which exceptions play a major role). I see no reason to create a separate method.

Enough, I'm just done with Werkspace. Hire a guy who will make sloppy code that has nothing to do with C#, just a PInvoke file of your lib, and pay him hundreds of dollars. Rick, enjoy your vision of C#, that is, destroying the OOP it was meant for and using procedural commands. Actually, I won't even argue with anything. I'll do my C# headers for LE 3 and use them for myself. The rumour is pretty much right: Werkspace is an elitist community, and I'm done fighting that, I'll rather slip into the "snobs" (sic) who keep their code to themselves. And to all potential buyers who view this reply (you probably won't, Josh will move it to the obscure C# forum), know that while Leadwerks is the best engine, Werkspace is the worst community.

Well, it's the difference between "Foo.GetBar()" and "Foo.Bar", and "Foo.SetBar(Xin)" and "Foo.Bar = Xin". Honestly, since the variation is always similar, it can only be seen as a language limitation. I wouldn't spend time implementing Get and Set methods in C#, everyone any familiar with C# would spit on them.

I would make Mono compatible headers for LE 3. It's not that hard either. Rick, please stop turning down the C# .NET community spirit or Leadwerks .NET for that matter, especially considering that you don't even intend to use it and stick with LE.NET. The community effort loses its momentum with comments like these.

I could give you the SVN address with the latest source and binaries (DLL) if you want. The performance was near perfect, I saw no problem at all. The syntax is much better than that of any other language, but that's in my very own biased (but not humble) opinion. I intended to try to write a OO layer and possibly even an official one if Josh ever settles in on the idea, but go ahead if you wish to do so yourself. Leadwerks .NET was a very long design process.

I think I pretty much made my mind that I won't pursue any other community effort for C# (Leadwerks .NET) in LE 2. We'll see if Josh is interested for it in LE 3. I'm tired of fighting communities and rollbacks without any support.

Josh, please contact me if ever we are to set up an official C# header for LE3; including OOP wrapping, which will mimic the exact same structure as the C++ one. As to the askers' question, LE .NET is no longer supported by Roland; it was, however, pretty stable. Leadwerks .NET is not based on LE .NET. However, it is a ver C# .NET approach to Leadwerks, much more intuitive than the procedural commands. With the massive rollbacks of the forum, Leadwerks .NET got deleted. I could repost it, but I'm in my finals at the moment, and I have no motivation to invest time in this, especially considering even the C# community is not very hot on the idea. Hopefully Josh will take the C# demands into consideration for LE3.

The vegetation on this is very crispy and good looking. The waterfall could use some work though, but I understand it's really hard to make (I myself have tried failed many times).

Tyler what the?! Hi. Man... Argh. Come back! And about that topic, I'd suggest frequent matrix updates with cubic spline interpolation.