Rekindled Phoenix Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 Credits to Lazlo (and several others) for creating this updated API for .Net developers using Leadwerks. Currently, only version .Net 4 is supported, and Visual Studio 2010 is the recommended IDE. Events, Inherited objects, and several other developer optimizations included. New repository link! SVN Repository http://www.assembla.com/spaces/leadwerks/ https://subversion.assembla.com/svn/leadwerks-csharp/ Credentials leadwerks.csharp / collaboration Issues regarding the use of these libraries, add a post in this thread For all other issues related to Leadwerks development for .Net in general, add a new thread I would highly recommend TortoiseSVN To view how to use it Click Here This is not ZioRed's library, which does not support events / entity inheritance and is a direct copy of the Leaderks API. Find that here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raz Posted May 26, 2011 Share Posted May 26, 2011 When logging in using the credentials you provided, I get a "Not permitted" error. Greets, Philipp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekindled Phoenix Posted May 27, 2011 Author Share Posted May 27, 2011 When logging in using the credentials you provided, I get a "Not permitted" error. You do not login to the website itself. Have you tried importing the files via TortoiseSVN? Once installed, right-click any windows explorer folder and click "SVN Checkout" URL of the repository is the URL above, along with credentials you will need to download. If the version of the libraries ever changes, right-click the folder and select "SVN Update". The files will be updated accordingly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raz Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Actually, I've tried to log in to the URL Lazlo provided in another thread (also assembla/leadwers/...), which didn't work either. That was definitely a SVN url. I'll let you know if Tortoise works [Edit] Yea, just like I said, even with Tortoise it doesn't work. It doesn't even ask for credentials, but cancels with a 405 (Not allowed) Greets, Philipp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L B Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Apparently, I removed public SVN access when I quit a couple of weeks ago out of the mess the Werkspace community implied. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marleys Ghost Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Apparently, I removed public SVN access when I quit a couple of weeks ago out of the mess the Werkspace community implied. The Werkspace community implied? you mean the very small percentage of those that use c# surely? Quote AMD Bulldozer FX-4 Quad Core 4100 Black Edition 2 x 4GB DDR3 1333Mhz Memory Gigabyte GeForce GTX 550 Ti OC 1024MB GDDR5 Windows 7 Home 64 bit BlitzMax 1.50 • Lua 5.1 • MaxGUI 1.41 • UU3D Pro • MessiahStudio Pro • Silo Pro 3D Coat • ShaderMap Pro • Hexagon 2 • Photoshop, Gimp & Paint.NET LE 2.5/3.4 • Skyline • UE4 • CE3 SDK • Unity 5 • Esenthel Engine 2.0 Marleys Ghost's YouTube Channel • Marleys Ghost's Blog "I used to be alive like you .... then I took an arrow to the head" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekindled Phoenix Posted May 28, 2011 Author Share Posted May 28, 2011 Apparently, I removed public SVN access when I quit a couple of weeks ago out of the mess the Werkspace community implied. What do you mean Lazlo?? If something is bothering you, post it on the forum! Let your grievances be heard by all. Some users on the forum quietly download and use the software provided, because it's there. The community is grateful for your efforts even if they do not express it. So that new users aren't left out, I'm half-tempted to just host the files myself... Anyone can message me regarding issues with the wrapper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L B Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 The Werkspace community implied? you mean the very small percentage of those that use c# surely? No, I meant these comments. RP, feel free to host the files. If people are determined, they'll just reflector it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 I think Lazlo's C# implementation is a very good one and a great contribution. Very well done Lazlo and even if I now are going back to C++, I still applaud you effort and work. The reason why I'm back to C++ is NOT that its something wrong with Laszlos C# Leadwerks. NET. In fact its great and a very good tool for C# users. No, No ... there reason is very simple. I have been coding C++ since the language was public available (more than 20 years) I have been coding C# for about 1 year. Taking that into consideration its obvious why I'm back to C++. I can almost code C++ in my sleep But for you young guys (which I'm definitely not at 57)I highly recommend to have a look at Lazlo's nice C# implementation and see for your self in that's something of interest. Anyway. Thanks Lazlo for doing a great work there. Cheers Roland Quote AV MX Linux Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raz Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 Indeed, coding in the language you're most fluent in sounds like a reasonable argument For me, I started out with Visual Basic 6 around 7 years ago, then switched to C++ and about 2 years ago started to program in C#. By now I have to say that out of all these languages, C# is definitely my favorite language, not only for writing tools, but basically for writing any application that's not requiring functionality only available to C++. Even then I'm sometimes intrigued to just write a short C# wrapper for the few functionalities I need that are only available via C++. So indeed, for all new developers (as well as for developers using .NET languages in general), Lazlo's Leadwerks.Net would be a great addition! Greets, Philipp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekindled Phoenix Posted May 28, 2011 Author Share Posted May 28, 2011 I've added a new repository link on the first post of this thread. The same credentials can be used to access the files. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 Are you sure the user name is "leadwerks.chsarp"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekindled Phoenix Posted May 28, 2011 Author Share Posted May 28, 2011 Are you sure the user name is "leadwerks.chsarp"? My apologies, it is 'csharp' Updated first post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekindled Phoenix Posted July 2, 2011 Author Share Posted July 2, 2011 Update! Community user Raz found that the AlphaMap class had a legacy index parameter. (This invalid parameter can still be found on the Leadwerks Wiki) This has been fixed, and now will no longer throw a managed pinvoke exception. Feel free to offer your critique, suggestions, and feedback! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted July 2, 2011 Share Posted July 2, 2011 Can the wrapper be embedded or compiled into the main exe? Quote Intel Core i7 975 @ 3.33GHz, 6GB ram, GTX 560 Super OC, Windows 7 Pro 64bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekindled Phoenix Posted July 2, 2011 Author Share Posted July 2, 2011 If you mean within your own application, it is possible. I did a quick Google search found this link with several options regarding resources and embedded DLLs: Embed DLL within EXE One option: ILMerge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted July 2, 2011 Share Posted July 2, 2011 If you mean within your own application, it is possible. I did a quick Google search found this link with several options regarding resources and embedded DLLs: Embed DLL within EXE One option: ILMerge What I mean is does the C# wrapper need to be compiled as a net dll, or can the source code be included into the game's solution? Quote Intel Core i7 975 @ 3.33GHz, 6GB ram, GTX 560 Super OC, Windows 7 Pro 64bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klepto2 Posted July 2, 2011 Share Posted July 2, 2011 The project can directly be included into your solution. Quote Intel® Core™ i7-8550U @ 1.80 Ghz 16GB RAM INTEL UHD Graphics 620 Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit-Version Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted July 2, 2011 Share Posted July 2, 2011 The project can directly be included into your solution. After playing around with the command line it seems a .netmodule can also be created. Quote Intel Core i7 975 @ 3.33GHz, 6GB ram, GTX 560 Super OC, Windows 7 Pro 64bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekindled Phoenix Posted July 2, 2011 Author Share Posted July 2, 2011 You can definitely include the source within your own engine. I would highly recommend obfuscating it before public distribution though, since the files are for licensed developers only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerH Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 I don't take it the SVN has original source code? From a Refelctor-ish look and a lot of things I have learned in the past year, this wrapper needs refactored, if not rewritten in 90% of parts. EDIT: Nevermind, HTML view was not showing the file list. SVN download grabbed all the files. Quote nVidia 530M Intel Core i7 - 2.3Ghz 8GB DDR3 RAM Windows 7 Ultimate (64x)----- Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate Google Chrome Creative Suite 5 FL Studio 10 Office 15 ----- Expert Professional Expert BMX Programmer ----- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekindled Phoenix Posted July 21, 2011 Author Share Posted July 21, 2011 If you haven't been following the recent LE news, Josh has said he will officially support .Net languages. Since Leadwerks.Net is an OO wrapper with inheritance, it will not be compatible with any "official" DLL releases in the future. I am debating the future of Leadwerks.Net, whether it be an abstracted DLL that is compatible with the official files, or stay a completely separate "unofficial" release. For those who use this library, what do you want? I'd prefer responses from those who use Leadwerks.Net over any other wrapper - Layer on top of official libraries (Compatibility!) - Separate download stay unofficial (Flexibility!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L B Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 Thanks for taking care of the C# community RP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekindled Phoenix Posted July 25, 2011 Author Share Posted July 25, 2011 Thanks Lazlo. I tried. Several people have different views on coding procedure. Eventually I will update your amazing library to be an extension of the official libraries. Your libraries had absolutely no bugs, which made maintenance easy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.