Jump to content

Vehicle WIP in Leadwerks 4.6

Josh

1,604 views

Here's a look at the new vehicle system that is being developed. The API has been simplified so you simply create a vehicle, add as many tires as you want, and start using it. The AddTire() command now accepts a model and the dimensions of the tire are calculated from the bounds of the mesh.

class Vehicle
{
	int AddTire(Model* model, bool steering=false, const float spring=500.0f, const float springrelaxation = 0.1f, const float springdamping = 10.0f);
	void SetGas(const float accel);
	void SetBrakes(const float brakes);
	void SetSteering(const float angle);
	static Vehicle* Create(Entity* entity);
};

A script will be provided which turns any vehicle model into a ready-to-use playable vehicle. The script searches for limb names that start with "wheel" or "tire" and turns those limbs into wheels. If they are positioned towards the front of the car, the script assumes the wheels can be turned with steering. You can also reverse the orientation of the vehicle if the model was designed backwards.

There is one big issue to solve still. When a vehicle drives on flat terrain the tires catch on the edges of the terrain triangles and the whole vehicle bounces around badly. I'm looking into how this can be solved with custom collision overrides. I do not know how long this will take, so it might or might not be ready by Christmas.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1


16 Comments


Recommended Comments

That video looks pretty solid.  I assume we create our own collision mesh(es) for the body?  For example, a car. a truck and a plough truck will have different looking meshes.

It would also be nice if the code that detects "wheel" and "tire" could also detect the words "front," "back," "left" and "right" in the names.  That way there would be no ambiguity and we can name a tire tire.front.left or FrontLeftWheel, for example.

Also, what do you mean by a script doing the interpretation?  How do people using only C++ get their car tires detected?

Share this comment


Link to comment

Yes, you can have your own physics shape for the chassis. In fact you can also now have your own physics shapes for the wheels.

A search for the term "wheel" will return a false positive if a limb called "steeringwheel" is encountered. Perhaps if the name contains "tire" or if the left five characters are "wheel" or if the name contains "wheel" AND does not contain "steer"?

It's easiest to just throw a script on a model, but a C++ example will also be provided.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Yeah, the rules seem pretty easy to set up and probably best to search for minimal terms, not combined terms.  If the name contains "steering" then it's safe to assume it's a steering wheel.  Name could also be "steering wheel" or "steering_wheel" so searching for "steeringwheel" might not work.  Though it's not too bad to ask devs to name limbs specific things (like how we have collisionhull right now), it's ideal to be flexible, if possible, to not even need to have devs alter their models.

Also, the model could include a spare tire on the back (or in the trunk), like Jeeps do (https://ddcfq0gxiontw.cloudfront.net/Review/39832078/17545495/medium_square.jpg) so not sure how you'd handle that.  I guess if the name includes "spare," it's disregarded.

Share this comment


Link to comment

This looks great.

But I have to ask: It would have been so interesting for me (and maybe others) to know the issue on how to get a solid car when using the joints system a few members here worked on for a few months.. ;) !! Could/is this now be possible ? 

Share this comment


Link to comment
1 hour ago, Jorns2 said:

So, that can be used for tanks ? and wil be avaiable for .lua?

You could make a tank with this using lots of wheels. I am not making a tread system right now, but that is possible simply by using the hinge joint:

32 minutes ago, Marcousik said:

This looks great.

But I have to ask: It would have been so interesting for me (and maybe others) to know the issue on how to get a solid car when using the joints system a few members here worked on for a few months.. ;) !! Could/is this now be possible ? 

Here is the source for the vehicle class. It just uses regular joints. There is one tricky part I have to customize though so the wheel collision is better at high speeds.
Vehicle.h
Vehicle.cpp

  • Confused 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

Here's another look at the physics. It looks very good but there are a couple of problems to work out still:

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

Okay great. Did you manage to use SetString() or slider joint() for the suspension ?

I could not find anything running ok with SetString() (well with 4.5)

The climb effect looks very nice, I think better than simple joints let do. how did you manage this ? Any tipps 😉

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

What does SetString have to do with vehicles?

i turned the friction way up on the tires. The climbing behavior is actually pretty realistic. A real 4x4 will do that, although the impact when it hit the hill probably would have ripped the wheels off

Share this comment


Link to comment

@Josh  "What does SetString have to do with vehicles?"

Well you recommended  to use SetSpring() for vehicles suspensions in Juli instead of enabling the slider joints limit. 

I wanted to know if you disable the limit on the suspension and use SetSpring() in 4.6 ?

Share this comment


Link to comment

SetSpring() not SetString() ;)

I am experimenting with the joint limit. It works about the same either way.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Okay yes, sure..little confusion.

Something more:

Do I have to replace the vehicles.h with the one you upload here ?

What should I do with the .cpp file? 

Can I use this with lua ? Im a newbie to this sorry

 

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Actually it helps me a lot because I try toread the c++ functions. I'm  actually wondering what is "mat" used for ?

Vec3 scale = entity->mat.GetScale();

Then it becames mat[1], mat[2] and mat[3] but I can't find the definition of this.

Can't find where does this "mat" comes out...

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Blog Entries

    • By Josh in Josh's Dev Blog 4
      I have been working on 2D rendering off and on since October. Why am I putting so much effort into something that was fairly simple in Leadwerks 4? I have been designing a system in anticipation of some features I want to see in the GUI, namely VR support and in-game 3D user interfaces. These are both accomplished with 2D drawing performed on a texture. Our system of sprite layers, cameras, and sprites was necessary in order to provide enough control to accomplish this.
      I now have 2D drawing to a texture working, this time as an official supported feature. In Leadwerks 4, some draw-to-texture features were supported, but it was through undocumented commands due to the complex design of shared resources between OpenGL contexts. Vulkan does not have this problem because everything, including contexts (or rather, the VK equivalent) is bound to an abstract VkInstance object.

      Here is the Lua code that makes this program:
      --Get the primary display local displaylist = ListDisplays() local display = displaylist[1]; if display == nil then DebugError("Primary display not found.") end local displayscale = display:GetScale() --Create a window local window = CreateWindow(display, "2D Drawing to Texture", 0, 0, math.min(1280 * displayscale.x, display.size.x), math.min(720 * displayscale.y, display.size.y), WINDOW_TITLEBAR) --Create a rendering framebuffer local framebuffer = CreateFramebuffer(window); --Create a world local world = CreateWorld() --Create second camera local texcam = CreateCamera(world) --Create a camera local camera = CreateCamera(world) camera:Turn(45,-45,0) camera:Move(0,0,-2) camera:SetClearColor(0,0,1,1) --Create a texture buffer local texbuffer = CreateTextureBuffer(512,512,1,true) texcam:SetRenderTarget(texbuffer) --Create scene local box = CreateBox(world) --Create render-to-texture material local material = CreateMaterial() local tex = texbuffer:GetColorBuffer() material:SetTexture(tex, TEXTURE_BASE) box:SetMaterial(material) --Create a light local light = CreateLight(world,LIGHT_DIRECTIONAL) light:SetRotation(55,-55,0) light:SetColor(2,2,2,1) --Create a sprite layer. This can be shared across different cameras for control over which cameras display the 2D elements local layer = CreateSpriteLayer(world) texcam:AddSpriteLayer(layer) texcam:SetPosition(0,1000,0)--put the camera really far away --Load a sprite to display local sprite = LoadSprite(layer, "Materials/Sprites/23.svg", 0, 0.5) sprite:MidHandle(true,true) sprite:SetPosition(texbuffer.size.x * 0.5, texbuffer.size.y * 0.5) --Load font local font = LoadFont("Fonts/arial.ttf", 0) --Text shadow local textshadow = CreateText(layer, font, "Hello!", 36 * displayscale.y, TEXT_LEFT, 1) textshadow:SetColor(0,0,0,1) textshadow:SetPosition(50,30) textshadow:SetRotation(90) --Create text text = textshadow:Instantiate(layer) text:SetColor(1,1,1,1) text:SetPosition(52,32) text:SetRotation(90) --Main loop while window:Closed() == false do sprite:SetRotation(CurrentTime() / 30) world:Update() world:Render(framebuffer) end I have also added a GetTexCoords() command to the PickInfo structure. This will calculate the tangent and bitangent for the picked triangle and then calculate the UV coordinate at the picked position. It is necessary to calculate the non-normalized tangent and bitangent to get the texture coordinate, because the values that are stored in the vertex array are normalized and do not include the length of the vectors.
      local pick = camera:Pick(framebuffer, mousepos.x, mousepos.y, 0, true, 0) if pick ~= nil then local texcoords = pick:GetTexCoords() Print(texcoords) end Maybe I will make this into a Mesh method like GetPolygonTexCoord(), which would work just as well but could potentially be useful for other things. I have not decided yet.
      Now that we have 2D drawing to a texture, and the ability to calculate texture coordinates at a position on a mesh, the next step will be to set up a GUI displayed on a 3D surface, and to send input events to the GUI based on the user interactions in 3D space. The texture could be applied to a computer panel, like many of the interfaces in the newer DOOM games, or it could be used as a panel floating in the air that can be interacted with VR controllers.
    • By Josh in Josh's Dev Blog 0
      Putting all the pieces together, I was able to create a GUI with a sprite layer, attach it to a camera with a texture buffer render target, and render the GUI onto a texture applied to a 3D surface. Then I used the picked UV coords to convert to mouse coordinates and send user events to the GUI. Here is the result:

      This can be used for GUIs rendered onto surfaces in your game, or for a user interface that can be interacted with in VR. This example will be included in the next beta update.
    • By Josh in Josh's Dev Blog 4
      I started to implement quads for tessellation, and at that point the shader system reached the point of being unmanageable. Rendering an object to a shadow map and to a color buffer are two different processes that require two different shaders. Turbo introduces an early Z-pass which can use another shader, and if variance shadow maps are not in use this can be a different shader from the shadow shader. Rendering with tessellation requires another set of shaders, with one different set for each primitive type (isolines, triangles, and quads). And then each one of these needs a masked and opaque option, if alpha discard is enabled.
      All in all, there are currently 48 different shaders a material could use based on what is currently being drawn. This is unmanageable.
      To handle this I am introducing the concept of a "shader family". This is a JSON file that lists all possible permutations of a shader. Instead of setting lots of different shaders in a material, you just set the shader family one:
      shaderFamily: "PBR.json" Or in code:
      material->SetShaderFamily(LoadShaderFamily("PBR.json")); The shader family file is a big JSON structure that contains all the different shader modules for each different rendering configuration: Here are the partial contents of my PBR.json file:
      { "turboShaderFamily" : { "OPAQUE": { "default": { "base": { "vertex": "Shaders/PBR.vert.spv", "fragment": "Shaders/PBR.frag.spv" }, "depthPass": { "vertex": "Shaders/Depthpass.vert.spv" }, "shadow": { "vertex": "Shaders/Shadow.vert.spv" } }, "isolines": { "base": { "vertex": "Shaders/PBR_Tess.vert.spv", "tessellationControl": "Shaders/Isolines.tesc.spv", "tessellationEvaluation": "Shaders/Isolines.tese.spv", "fragment": "Shaders/PBR_Tess.frag.spv" }, "shadow": { "vertex": "Shaders/DepthPass_Tess.vert.spv", "tessellationControl": "Shaders/DepthPass_Isolines.tesc.spv", "tessellationEvaluation": "Shaders/DepthPass_Isolines.tese.spv" }, "depthPass": { "vertex": "Shaders/DepthPass_Tess.vert.spv", "tessellationControl": "DepthPass_Isolines.tesc.spv", "tessellationEvaluation": "DepthPass_Isolines.tese.spv" } }, "triangles": { "base": { "vertex": "Shaders/PBR_Tess.vert.spv", "tessellationControl": "Shaders/Triangles.tesc.spv", "tessellationEvaluation": "Shaders/Triangles.tese.spv", "fragment": "Shaders/PBR_Tess.frag.spv" }, "shadow": { "vertex": "Shaders/DepthPass_Tess.vert.spv", "tessellationControl": "Shaders/DepthPass_Triangles.tesc.spv", "tessellationEvaluation": "Shaders/DepthPass_Triangles.tese.spv" }, "depthPass": { "vertex": "Shaders/DepthPass_Tess.vert.spv", "tessellationControl": "DepthPass_Triangles.tesc.spv", "tessellationEvaluation": "DepthPass_Triangles.tese.spv" } }, "quads": { "base": { "vertex": "Shaders/PBR_Tess.vert.spv", "tessellationControl": "Shaders/Quads.tesc.spv", "tessellationEvaluation": "Shaders/Quads.tese.spv", "fragment": "Shaders/PBR_Tess.frag.spv" }, "shadow": { "vertex": "Shaders/DepthPass_Tess.vert.spv", "tessellationControl": "Shaders/DepthPass_Quads.tesc.spv", "tessellationEvaluation": "Shaders/DepthPass_Quads.tese.spv" }, "depthPass": { "vertex": "Shaders/DepthPass_Tess.vert.spv", "tessellationControl": "DepthPass_Quads.tesc.spv", "tessellationEvaluation": "DepthPass_Quads.tese.spv" } } } } } A shader family file can indicate a root to inherit values from. The Blinn-Phong shader family pulls settings from the PBR file and just switches some of the fragment shader values.
      { "turboShaderFamily" : { "root": "PBR.json", "OPAQUE": { "default": { "base": { "fragment": "Shaders/Blinn-Phong.frag.spv" } }, "isolines": { "base": { "fragment": "Shaders/Blinn-Phong_Tess.frag.spv" } }, "triangles": { "base": { "fragment": "Shaders/Blinn-Phong_Tess.frag.spv" } }, "quads": { "base": { "fragment": "Shaders/Blinn-Phong_Tess.frag.spv" } } } } } If you want to implement a custom shader, this is more work because you have to define all your changes for each possible shader variation. But once that is done, you have a new shader that will work with all of these different settings, which in the end is easier. I considered making a more complex inheritance / cascading schema but I think eliminating ambiguity is the most important goal in this and that should override any concern about the verbosity of these files. After all, I only plan on providing a couple of these files and you aren't going to need any more unless you are doing a lot of custom shaders. And if you are, this is the best solution for you anyways.
      Consequently, the baseShader, depthShader, etc. values in the material file definition are going away. Leadwerks .mat files will always use the Blinn-Phong shader family, and there is no way to change this without creating a material file in the new JSON material format.
      The shader class is no longer derived from the Asset class because it doesn't correspond to a single file. Instead, it is just a dumb container. A ShaderModule class derived from the Asset class has been added, and this does correspond with a single .spv file. But you, the user, won't really need to deal with any of this.
      The result of this is that one material will work with tessellation enabled or disabled, quad, triangle, or line meshes, and animated meshes. I also added an optional parameter in the CreatePlane(), CreateBox(), and CreateQuadSphere() commands that will create these primitives out of quads instead of triangles. The main reason for supporting quad meshes is that the tessellation is cleaner when quads are used. (Note that Vulkan still displays quads in wireframe mode as if they are triangles. I think the renderer probably converts them to normal triangles after the tessellation stage.)


      I also was able to implement PN Quads, which is a quad version of the Bezier curve that PN Triangles add to tessellation.



      Basically all the complexity is being packed into the shader family file so that these decisions only have to be made once instead of thousands of times for each different material.
×
×
  • Create New...